# How Emad Mostaque’s The Last Economy Fits with The Freedom Formula
Here’s a clear bridge between **The Last Economy (TLE)** and your **Freedom Formula**, plus concrete moves we can roll out for the audience right away.
TL;DR (what changes for us)
* **• Intelligence just became abundant.** Our economy shifts from managing scarcity to stewarding *abundance*—especially abundant cognitive work. We must help people decouple worth from wages and move from job security to *purpose creation*. * **• Three futures are on the table.** If we do nothing, we drift toward *Digital Feudalism*; our work should explicitly build the alternative: a symbiotic, widely-owned intelligence economy. * **• Measure what matters.** GDP rewards the wrong things and ignores flourishing; we should give our audience a practical “life-and-community vitality dashboard” instead. * **• MIND capitals are the new balance sheet.** People and communities that compound **M**aterial, **I**ntelligence, **N**etwork, and **D**iversity capitals stay resilient and free. * **• The job is unbundling.** Income is being automated; identity, community, purpose, and structure must be *designed*—that’s where the Freedom Formula can lead.⠀
1) Where TLE plugs into the Freedom Formula
A. From “work = worth” to “purpose = worth”
TLE argues the cost of many cognitive tasks is collapsing toward ~0; the system processes abundance as a *catastrophe* because it was built for scarcity. That makes traditional “job creation” a poor North Star; we must help people *create purpose* and *agency* independent of payroll identity. **Freedom Formula upgrade:** Reframe outcomes from “get a better job/build a business” to **build a purpose stack** (Identity, Community, Purpose, Structure) that survives job automation and compounds freedom.B. Choose the future (explicitly)
TLE lays out three stable end‑states; the default is *Digital Feudalism* if access/ownership of AI is concentrated. Our programs should actively steer members toward *broadly-owned tools, data, and skills*, not reliance on closed platforms. **Freedom Formula upgrade:** Make “**algorithmic agency**” (owning your agent, your data, and your workflows) a core pillar.C. Measure the right things (MIND)
TLE replaces one-dimensional GDP with a four‑capital dashboard: **M**aterial (energy, health, financial base), **I**ntelligence (learning, pattern library), **N**etwork (trust, reciprocity), **D**iversity (optionality, antifragility). It also lists concrete indicators at national, company, and individual scale; we can adapt these for members’ weekly check‑ins. **Freedom Formula upgrade:** Give every member a **MIND Score** and a personal dashboard that they update monthly.D. Attention is the last scarce thing
As AI kills opportunity cost for digital production, *attention* becomes the scarce non‑renewable. Our guidance should shift from “productivity hacks” to **attention hygiene, meaning-making, and craft**. **Freedom Formula upgrade:** Add an **Attention Budget** and weekly “meaning sprints.”E. Build “geometry,” not just goals
TLE’s policy idea—**geometry engineering**—nudges systems with defaults and incentives instead of top‑down commands. We can use the same logic inside our community: design incentives, default settings, and shared infrastructure so the *easiest* action is the aligned one. **Freedom Formula upgrade:** Redesign community mechanics (reputation, bounties, challenges) to reward compounding MIND behaviors by default.2) Freedom Formula × MIND: a practical crosswalk
| **TLE’s MIND Capital** | **Freedom Formula focus** | **What we change/do** | |:-:|:-:|:-:| | **M – Material** | Money, health, time runway | 12‑week “Resilience Base” (cash buffers, energy/sleep, simple operating expenses) + *Resilient Tech Stack* (local-first notes, backups). | | **I – Intelligence** | Skills & leverage | “Pattern Library” build: members ship 1 reusable SOP/template/week; pair it with a personal AI agent trained on their notes. | | **N – Network** | Trust & community | “5:1 Network Practice”: five helpful micro‑acts for every ask; weekly salons and guilds with reciprocity logs. | | **D – Diversity** | Options & antifragility | “Option Portfolio”: run monthly $100 micro‑bets (new channel, product slice, partnership) + quarterly scenario swap to avoid monocultures. |3) Six moves we can roll out for the audience now
1. **1 The MIND Dashboard (member-facing).** * ◦ 12 questions, 3 per capital, scored 0–5; trend monthly. * ◦ Example items: *Material:* sleep average, cash runway; *Intelligence:* hours of deliberate practice, # of reusable SOPs; *Network:* weekly reciprocity acts, # of high‑trust peers; *Diversity:* # of active options across skills/income/locations. * ◦ Grounded in TLE’s Appendix C indicator lists; we’re simply scaling them down to the personal level. 2. **2 “Unbundle the Job” workshops (4 sessions).** * ◦ Identity (Who am I when I’m not my role?), Community (build a tribe), Purpose (projects > positions), Structure (daily/weekly cadence). * ◦ This directly responds to TLE’s “Great Unbundling of Work.” 3. **3 Attention as Currency toolkit.** * ◦ Attention Budget (weekly), Inputs fasts, “meaning sprints,” and a “distraction recovery protocol.” * ◦ Aligns with TLE’s point that attention—not output—is now the binding constraint. 4. **4 Algorithmic Agency starter kit.** * ◦ A personal AI agent, a private knowledge base, and data‑ownership basics. * ◦ The aim is to resist the “Feudal” path where a few platforms own everyone’s leverage. 5. **5 Geometry inside the community.** * **◦ Defaults:** Every new member gets a reciprocity log, a weekly office hour slot, and one “give-first” micro‑bounty to complete. * **◦ Incentives:** Streaks and reputation points tied to MIND behaviors; small grants for public‑good templates. * ◦ Mirrors TLE’s “policy as geometry engineering.” 6. **6 Access, not stipends: Universal Access to Intelligence (UAI) ethos.** * ◦ Instead of promising income, we promise *tools + training + trust*: compute credits (where feasible), model access, curated datasets, and a cohort to learn with. * ◦ This echoes TLE’s UAI proposal as a new social contract focused on *access* and *network capital*, not cash alone.⠀
4) Program structure we can run (12 weeks)
* **• Weeks 1–3: Material Base** – Sleep/energy reset, cashflow simplification, antifragile ops. * **• Weeks 4–6: Intelligence Engine** – Build your Pattern Library (12 SOPs), agent-onboarding, “show your work” publishing. * **• Weeks 7–9: Network Compounding** – Reciprocity practice, guild formation, peer reviews. * **• Weeks 10–12: Diversity/Options** – Three micro‑bets, scenario planning, kill/scale decisions. Each week: 1 cohort call, 1 clinic, 1 deliverable, and a 10‑minute MIND check‑in tied to the dashboard.⠀
5) Messaging shifts for our audience
* • From **“get ahead at work”** → **“design a life where work isn’t your identity.”** (TLE’s unbundling.) * • From **“productivity = output”** → **“productivity = wise attention.”** (Opportunity cost shifts to attention.) * • From **“learn skills for jobs”** → **“build a Pattern Library and an agent that compounds your patterns.”** (Intelligence abundance.) * • From **“economic growth”** → **“human flourishing”** (why we use a MIND dashboard, not GDP vibes).⠀
6) What we track (leading indicators)
* **• M:** Sleep average, cash runway months, maintenance debt cleared. * **• I:** Hours of deliberate practice/week, # of reusable SOPs/templates, agent‑assisted outputs/week. * **• N:** Weekly reciprocity acts, # of strong ties, # of co‑created assets. * **• D:** # of active experiments/options, concentration risk score. These are direct, personal translations of TLE’s Appendix C indicators.⠀
7) Guardrails (what wedon’t promise)
* **• Not “UBI will save us.”** TLE warns the UBI‑as‑cure narrative ignores power dynamics and the psychology of meaning; access and agency matter more. We focus on *tools, trust, and purpose*, not stipends. * **• Not “the system will adapt for you.”** TLE argues homeostasis arguments underestimate the shock and overestimate the system’s health. We teach proactive redesign, not passive optimism.⠀
8) Ready-to-use assets for the audience
**A. MIND self‑assessment (score 0–5):** * *• Material:* I sleep 7–9 hours; I have ≥6 months runway; my ops/backups are robust. * *• Intelligence:* I learn ≥5 hrs/week; I publish/templatize weekly; my agent improves monthly. * *• Network:* I log 5+ give‑first acts/week; I have 5+ strong ties I could call today; I co‑create each month. * *• Diversity:* I’m running 3 active micro‑bets; no single client/channel >40%; I’ve rehearsed a Plan B.⠀**B. Attention Budget (weekly):** * • 3 “meaning sprints,” 2 deep‑work blocks/day, 1 digital Sabbath; track “attention leaks” and one fix/week.
⠀**C. Unbundle-the-Job reflection:** * • Identity without the role, your 3 “craft arenas,” communities you will serve, your default daily/weekly cadence.
⠀**D. Algorithmic Agency checklist:** * • Local-first notes, private vector DB, personal model/agent, data‑sharing guardrails, “recipes” (SOPs) you own.
⠀