# The Adoption Cycle of Tech as Told by History

Updated: 2025-10-21T15:16:08Z

#ai#ai-buildout#lessonsfromhistory

Please research from books, articles and other sources how the implementation of computers revolutionised payroll, accounting, stock management etc in the late 1970s through to the 1990s. Please give me a timeline that tries to track the s-curve of adoption. Please make this a comprehensive, detailed, documented analysis that focuses on countries in Europe and the US.

**Summary (late‑1970s → 1990s):**\ Back‑office computerisation moved from mainframes/minis in large firms to PCs, LANs and client‑server in *everyone else*, culminating in barcode/EDI/ERP integration. The adoption pattern is a classic S‑curve: long, quiet build‑up in the late 1970s; take‑off across the 1980s; saturation by the mid/late‑1990s in the US and most of Europe---especially in payroll, accounting and inventory control. SAP+4Wikipedia+4IEEE Standards Association+4

------------------------------------------------------------------------

What actually changed (and why it changed)

- **Cheap compute & easy software.** Spreadsheets turned microcomputers into financial tools. *VisiCalc* (1979) was the first spreadsheet; *Lotus 1‑2‑3* (1983) became the IBM PC's "killer app," driving adoption for budgeting, GL modeling, and reconciliations. Wikipedia+1

- **LANs & client‑server.** Ethernet's 1983 standard made office networking routine, enabling multi‑user accounting, shared ledgers, and networked stock files. Client‑server apps in the early 1990s (Oracle, PeopleSoft) then scaled finance/HR beyond a single PC. IEEE Standards Association+1

- **Standards for moving data.** EDI took purchase orders/invoices off paper (ANSI X12 in the US from 1979; UN/EDIFACT global standard 1987), and was pervasive among big enterprises by the late 1990s: "about 80% of the dollar value of intercompany transactions among Fortune 500" flowed via EDI. Data Interchange+2Wikipedia+2

- **Barcodes & scanning.** UPC scanning (US) and EAN (Europe) connected tills to inventory ledgers. Roughly a third of US supermarkets installed scanners within ten years of the first 1974 installation; UK's first scan was in 1979, with broad diffusion across the 1980s--90s. NBER+2www2.census.gov+2

- **MRP→MRP II→ERP.** Orlicky's MRP (1970s) matured into MRP II (Oliver Wight, 1983), then into ERP (term coined c.1990) integrating finance, materials, and HR. SAP's R/3 (1992) was the watershed for integrated, client‑server finance+inventory across Europe and the US. SAP+3Google Books+3Google Books+3

- **Payroll at scale.** Outsourcing (ADP) and packaged payroll linked tax tables, time systems, and direct deposit. By fiscal 1995, ADP's Employer Services served "over 300,000 clients," with **Autopay** used by 200k+ and **10.5 million** quarterly payroll tax returns filed on clients' behalf---industrialisation of payroll compliance. Annual Reports

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adoption evidence (US & Europe)

- **US small business (mid‑1980s):** In a national NFIB survey (1985), **40%** of small firms had computers; top uses were accounting, word processing and "financial planning," i.e., spreadsheets---an early mass‑market toe‑hold. *Short quote*: "The most frequent uses are accounting and word processing."

- **US workplaces (mid‑1980s onward):** The Census' 1984 CPS was the first national attempt to measure computer use at work/home, a baseline for the rapid run‑up that followed. www2.census.gov

- **France as a European bellwether (firm‑level surveys 1987→1993):**

- Banking/insurance had very high intensity (about **70%** of employees using computers in 1987, **\~90%** by 1993).

- Goods‑producing industries rose from **\~25% (1987)** to **45--50% (1993)** of employees using computers; food/intermediate/consumer goods from **\~15%** to **25--30%**.

- By 1993, nearly **all firms** had some computer users (industry shares **85%--99%**).

- Among tasks, "**production, inventory and accounting** come next, with a frequency of about **35%**" among users (documentation first).\ These are unusually clear, function‑specific European datapoints. NBER+1

- **Midrange platforms as a proxy for back‑office diffusion:** IBM's AS/400 (announced 1988) had an estimated **111,000** installations by end‑1990 and **\~250,000** by 1994---the workhorse for accounting, payroll and inventory in mid‑market firms on both sides of the Atlantic. Wikipedia

- **EDI penetration (late 1990s):** Despite only \~100,000 US companies using EDI, large‑firm **transaction *value*** was overwhelmingly EDI‑based---good foreshadowing of supplier mandates by big retailers and manufacturers. World Bank

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stylised timeline: the S‑curve (US & Europe), with function‑specific landmarks

> **Legend:** 🟢 payroll; 🔵 accounting/finance; 🟠 inventory/stock; ⚙️ > enabling tech/standards.

**1977--1982: Seeding (innovators / early adopters)**

- 1977--79: Microcomputers arrive in offices; **VisiCalc** (1979) catalyses modeling/budgeting. 🔵 Wikipedia

- 1980--83: Ethernet commercialised; standardised in **1983** → office LANs. ⚙️ IEEE Standards Association

- 1981: IBM PC launches; accountants discover 1‑2‑3 two years later. 🔵 WIRED

- 1979 (US), **1982 UK TRADACOMS**, **1987 UN/EDIFACT**: EDI standards emerge. ⚙️ Data Interchange+1

- 1974 (US) / **1979 (UK)**: first barcode scans; EAN system formalised in Europe in **1977**. 🟠 gs1uk.org+2syncni.com+2\ **Adoption signal:** Back‑office computing dominated by mainframes/minis; early PC pilots for spreadsheets. Large retailers/manufacturers standardise codes/data but coverage is spotty.

**1983--1986: Early majority takes notice (the inflection)**

- **Lotus 1‑2‑3 (1983)** becomes the killer app for the IBM PC in finance. 🔵 WIRED

- **LANs** and first client‑server experiments appear in finance/HR. ⚙️ IEEE Standards Association

- **NFIB 1985:** 40% of US small firms have computers; accounting is a top use. 🔵

- **Supermarkets:** \~⅓ adopt scanners within a decade of 1974; margin gains start to justify rollout. 🟠 NBER\ **Adoption signal:** Spreadsheets and packaged small‑business accounting (e.g., Peachtree) move PCs from hobby to bookkeeping utility; scanning and EDI pilots create stock‑ledger links. Fit Small Business

**1987--1991: Acceleration (early → late majority)**

- **France 1987--1993 surveys:** goods industries climb from \~25% to 45--50% of staff using computers; banking/insurance \~70%→\~90%. Payroll, inventory, accounting among top computerised tasks. 🟢🔵🟠 NBER

- **ANSI X12 and EDIFACT** mature; UK retail uses **TRADACOMS** widely. ⚙️ Data Interchange+1

- **AS/400 (1988)** explodes in the mid‑market, hosting GL/AP/AR, payroll and stock control. 🟢🔵🟠 Wikipedia\ **Adoption signal:** The *systems of record* (GL/payroll/inventory) move off paper or bespoke minis onto standardised platforms (AS/400, PC+LAN).

**1992--1996: Integration & scale (late majority)**

- **SAP R/3 (1992)** releases; client‑server ERP ties **FICO** (finance & controlling) to **MM/PP/SD** (materials, production, sales). 🔵🟠 SAP

- **PeopleSoft** (HRMS 1989; financials by 1992) and **Oracle Applications** (Release 8 in 1990) drive client‑server finance/HR adoption in the US and Europe. 🟢🔵 Wikipedia+1

- **ECR Europe (1994)** codifies retailer‑manufacturer process integration; scanners + EDI + replenishment become mainstream in European grocery. 🟠⚙️ Wikipedia

- **ADP (FY95):** "over **300,000** clients," **200,000+** Autopay; **10.5M** quarterly payroll tax returns filed---payroll outsourcing is mass‑market. 🟢 Annual Reports\ **Adoption signal:** Enterprises converge on integrated suites; SMEs standardise on PC accounting and outsourced payroll.

**1997--1999: Saturation (laggards mop‑up)**

- **EDI dominance** in large‑firm trade value (≈**80%** of Fortune‑500 intercompany transaction value flows via EDI). ⚙️ World Bank

- **ERP ubiquity**---and risks. The **FoxMeyer** case (1996 bankruptcy; suit filed 1998) shows how aggressive R/3 rollouts could overreach; a reminder that integration is power *and* exposure. 🔵🟠 WIRED

- **Y2K remediation** (not cited above) forces final upgrades/migrations; the laggards buy packaged software or outsource.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Function‑by‑function impact

**Payroll (US & Europe)**

- **Automation & compliance:** ADP's mid‑90s scale and its "Full‑Service Direct Deposit" illustrate platformisation of payroll. *Short quote:* ADP served "over 300,000 clients," with integrated tax filing and funds transmission. 🟢 Annual Reports

- **Public sector digitisation (UK):** Parliament debated **computerisation of PAYE** in 1981; nationwide roll‑out targeted by 1987/88---creating the regulatory substrate that motivated employer systems and bureaus. Hansard

**Accounting/Finance**

- **Spreadsheets → packages → suites:** From VisiCalc/1‑2‑3 to mid‑market ledgers (Peachtree, Great Plains) and then to **Oracle Financials/PeopleSoft/SAP** in larger firms; Oracle's **Release 8 (1990)** specifically targets the client‑server accounting environment. 🔵 Fit Small Business+2Wikipedia+2

**Inventory/Stock**

- **Barcodes/Scanning:** US and UK adoption in the 1980s → labour‑productivity gains (\~**4.5%** in early years) and reliable perpetual inventory files. 🟠 NBER

- **MRP→ERP:** MRP (Orlicky; 1975) → **MRP II** (Oliver Wight; 1983/84) → ERP (Gartner, 1990s) connect stock, purchasing, and finance---"one set of books." 🟠🔵 Google Books+2Google Books+2

------------------------------------------------------------------------

A data‑anchored S‑curve approximation (US & Europe)

> **Interpretation:** not a single metric; triangulates *computer use at > work* and *function‑specific proxies* (EDI, scanning, ERP, payroll > outsourcing). Europe is heterogeneous---France's firm‑level surveys > are used as an EU anchor.

**1983--86** **\~25--35%** of NFIB survey; Basker productivity study. workers in advanced NBER sectors; **40%** of US small firms own a computer by 1985; scanning reaches \~⅓ of US grocers by mid‑80s.

**1987--91** EU: goods industries French TOTTO surveys; AS/400 install base. NBER+1 **\~25%** computer users in 1987 (bank/insurance **\~70%**); mid‑market platforms (AS/400) surge.

**1992--96** EU industries French TOTTO; SAP R/3; ADP FY95. Annual **45--50%** (goods) Reports+3NBER+3NBER+3 and **\~90%** (bank/insurance) by 1993; near‑universal firm‑level exposure **(85--99% of firms)**; ERP rollouts; payroll outsourcing mainstream.

**1997--99** Saturation among World Bank (2001) on EDI; FoxMeyer cautionary tale. World medium/large firms; Bank+1 SMEs standardise on packaged accounting + payroll bureaus; big‑firm trade value **\~80%** over EDI. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

![](images/media/rId43.svg){width="0.20833333333333334in" height="0.20833333333333334in"}

> *Telltale EU datapoint:* in France, by 1993 "nearly all firms are > indeed using computers," with **production, inventory, and > accounting** among the most computerised tasks. > NBER

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary sources & granular notes (selected)

- **Cortada's histories** document how office work and retail/manufacturing were transformed---good macro context across the period. De Gruyter Brill+1

- **SAP's own timeline** dates **R/3 to 1992**, marking the ERP phase‑change. SAP

- **Oracle's corporate history** (Release 8, 1990) underscores the client‑server pivot for accounting. Oracle

- **NFIB 1985**: small‑firm PC adoption and *use* for accounting. *Short quotes (≤25 words):* "About 40 percent of small business owners have a computer... The most frequent uses are accounting and word processing."

- **French firm surveys (1987/1993)** provide hard EU percentages across industries and tasks. *Short quotes:* "production, inventory and accounting come next, with a frequency of about 35%." NBER

- **ADP 10‑K, FY1995** shows payroll's scale. *Short quotes:* "over 300,000 clients" and "filed over 10.5 million quarterly payroll tax returns." Annual Reports

- **Barcodes:** GS1 UK retells the 1974 US first scan and the 1979 first UK scan; Basker's NBER study quantifies productivity and diffusion. gs1uk.org+2syncni.com+2

- **EDI:** standards lineage (X12, EDIFACT) and late‑90s penetration among large US firms. Data Interchange+2Wikipedia+2

- **AS/400 install base** is a practical proxy for mid‑market back‑office computerisation (accounting/stock/payroll) worldwide. Wikipedia

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Takeaways (and a contrarian coda)

1. **S‑curve confirmed, but task‑specific.** Payroll, basic GL/AP, and inventory booking went electronic first; deeper integration (MRP II/ERP, EDI‑linked replenishment) lagged by 5--10 years. The French firm data make this unusually visible. NBER

2. **Networks mattered more than CPUs.** Ethernet+LANs and EDI/GS1 standards generated the step‑change in *process* efficiency; CPU price/performance merely enabled it. IEEE Standards Association+1

3. **Europe's path was retail‑first integration.** EAN/GS1 + TRADACOMS → EDIFACT + ECR Europe meant grocery/CPG supply chains often led in cross‑firm integration---even as German manufacturing led in ERP. Wikipedia+1

4. **Outsourcing is part of "adoption."** The payroll revolution was as much ADP's operational scale as it was in‑house software. A reminder that *who* computes is as consequential as *what* runs. Annual Reports

5. **Not all roses:** FoxMeyer's R/3 failure shows integration increases operational leverage *and* fragility; technology programmes must be scoped to organisational capacity. WIRED

*Humour footnote*: The 1980s promised the paperless office; we got faster printers. The 1990s promised one source of truth; we got spreadsheets *and* ERP. Progress---like inventory---comes in batches.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Where to dig next (if you want to go even deeper)

- **Industry‑by‑industry runs** in Cortada's *Digital Hand* volumes for richer sector context (manufacturing vs. retail vs. finance). PagePlace

- **Country‑specific archives** (e.g., UK DTI/ONS 1990s ICT surveys) to refine the EU curve by country.

- **Vendor primary filings** (e.g., SAP annual reports mid‑90s, PeopleSoft/Oracle 10‑Ks) for customer counts by module to sharpen the ERP slope. Annual Reports

If you'd like, I can turn this into a one‑page chart pack: a stylised S‑curve with the datapoint anchors (France 1987/93; NFIB 1985; ADP 1995; EDI and barcode milestones), and a separate panel just for retail (scanning/ECR) versus manufacturing (MRP/ERP).

Ultimately I'm trying to use lessons from history to better model how AI will be adopted, where it might find traction, generate productivity increases & cost savings first and then what the 'mainframe to desktop to smartphone to cloud computing' paradigm can teach us. Using your research above and this framing give me your intuition.

**Summary (working theory):**\ AI's enterprise adoption is rhyming with back‑office computerisation (late‑1970s→1990s): a quiet seeding, a spreadsheet‑like "killer app" moment (copilots), then a standards‑and‑governance phase (the new EDI: APIs, provenance, ISO‑42001), followed by integration (ERP‑like agents glued into workflows). Early measurable productivity gains cluster in text‑heavy, codified work---coding, customer support, drafting---while high‑risk, audited domains lag until rules harden and data plumbing is standardized. Costs are collapsing (inference \~280× cheaper vs. late‑2022 at GPT‑3.5‑level), so the S‑curve steepens as governance catches up. Stanford HAI

------------------------------------------------------------------------

How the 1980s--90s playbook maps to AI (the rhymes)

- **Killer apps pull hardware: VisiCalc/1‑2‑3 ⟶ Copilots.** Spreadsheets dragged PCs into finance; today, developer and office copilots are doing the same for AI. In trials, GitHub Copilot users completed a coding task **55.8% faster**; call‑center agents with a gen‑AI assistant resolved **\~15%** more issues per hour. These are "spreadsheet‑level" deltas that justify adoption budgets. arXiv+1\ *Short quotes*: "completed the task **55.8% faster**." / "access to AI assistance **increases...by 15%**." arXiv+1

- **LANs & EDI ⟶ APIs, function calling, & provenance.** Ethernet + EDI standards made multi‑user accounting and inter‑firm trade possible; the AI equivalents are reliable **function calling/structured outputs** for tool‑use and **content provenance (C2PA)** to control risk when machines generate content. OpenAI+1\ *Short quote*: C2PA is an "**open technical standard**...to establish the origin and edits of digital content." c2pa.org

- **Midrange/minis & AS/400 ⟶ enterprise suites with embedded AI.** Where the AS/400 hosted GL/AP/Payroll, modern suites (M365/Workday/ServiceNow, etc.) embed copilots/agents that inherit identity, permissions and data. Expect value to concentrate first in **systems you already use** rather than green‑field apps---just as firms bought R/3 before they rewrote finance. SAP's own history pegs **R/3 to 1992**, the moment "integration" became the business case. SAP

- **Barcodes ⟶ machine‑readable IDs & audit trails for AI‑made content.** UPC/EAN turned tills into inventory ledgers; AI needs "IDs for facts and files." C2PA/Content Credentials will be that barcode‑like substrate for compliance and auditability as synthetic media flows through finance, HR and customer‑facing channels. spec.c2pa.org

- **Payroll outsourcing (ADP) ⟶ AI‑native managed services.** Many firms won't build agent ops; they'll **buy** them. The historical rhyme: by FY95 ADP served "**over 300,000 clients**" and filed "**over 10.5 million quarterly payroll tax returns**," industrialising compliance at scale. Expect similar AI‑enabled BPO in support, AP/AR, and claims. Annual Reports

- **Rules unlock the late majority.** In the 80s--90s, standards/regs underwrote scale (e.g., EDI). For AI, **NIST AI RMF 1.0** (trustworthiness), **ISO/IEC 42001** (AI management systems), and the **EU AI Act** (hard deadlines in 2025--2027) are the gating items for high‑risk functions in Europe and for global multinationals. NIST Publications+2ISO+2\ *Short quote (EU):* "entered into force on **1 August 2024**... **fully applicable**... **2 August 2026** (with staged earlier dates)." Digital Strategy

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Where productivity and cost‑savings show up first (evidence → intuition)

- **Software & internal tools (now).** Measurable speed/quality gains for coding tasks; spillovers into analytics/automation as copilots learn your codebase and APIs. These behave like **the first spreadsheets** for engineers: high ROI, low compliance frictions. arXiv

- **Customer support & service ops (now).** Real‑world deployment shows **\~14--15%** productivity lift on tickets handled per hour, with the biggest gains for novices---an "inverse skill bias" different from early automation waves. Faster resolution, lower turnover. OUP Academic

- **Professional writing & marketing content (now).** Controlled experiments show sizeable speed/quality improvements for drafting and iteration on mid‑skill writing. Brand/compliance risk requires provenance and review, but the labor curve is clearly bending. Science

- **Back‑office document flows (near‑term):** **AP/AR matching, invoice extraction, expense audit, policy Q&A,** contract templating. These mirror 1980s accounting packages: narrow scope, high frequency, clean metrics (touchless‑rate, cycle time). Governance will favor systems **inside existing ERP/HRIS** borders first.

- **Procurement & supply chain "glue" (mid‑phase):** Agentic reconciliations, EDI → API translations, replenishment notes, exception handling---once function‑calling is robust and provenance attached, the **multi‑firm** step change looks like 1990s EDI+ECR Europe redux. OpenAI

- **Finance & risk (later):** Reconciliations, close‑checklists, controls testing, model documentation will adopt **after** ISO‑42001 + EU Act processes settle. High‑stakes narratives (earnings MD&A, audited statements) keep humans in the loop longest.

- **Field/edge work (later, then fast):** As small models improve and on‑device inference spreads, the **smartphone‑era analogue** kicks in---assistants for sales, field service, inspections. The cost curve is already steep: AI Index notes **\>280×** drop in GPT‑3.5‑level inference costs 2022→2024. Stanford HAI

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why adoption is lumpy (and how to model it)

- **Inside vs. outside the "jagged frontier."** RCTs with BCG consultants: **within** the AI frontier, performance and speed jump; **outside**, AI can **degrade** accuracy ("polished wrong answers"). The modeling implication: expect bimodal ROI by task; prioritize **codified, text‑heavy, retrieval‑friendly** work first. Harvard Business School\ *Short quote:* "outside... the frontier, AI output is inaccurate... and **degrades human performance**." Harvard Business School

- **Bottom‑up use outpaces top‑down deployment.** Microsoft's global Work Trend Index reported **\~75%** of knowledge workers using AI at work; yet formal **firm‑level** use to produce goods/services in the US was still **\~3.8%** in late‑2023 (BTOS). Your S‑curve should **separate worker usage from governed deployment**. Microsoft+1

- **Regulatory staging matters (esp. Europe).** With **GPAI obligations** live from **Aug 2, 2025**, and high‑risk system rules fully biting in **2026--27**, many EU enterprises will **sequence** adoption (assistants first, then regulated workflows). That's your second inflection. Digital Strategy

- **Installation vs. deployment (Perez lens).** We are still in **installation**---massive infra and tooling build‑out (consulting & data centers); the broad productivity wave typically shows in the **deployment** phase when standards harden and integration dominates. Accenture's **\$3B** AI push is a tell for the integrator‑heavy middle innings. Reuters

------------------------------------------------------------------------

A stylised S‑curve for AI in US/Europe back‑ and front‑office (2024--2030+)

> *Metric to track*: share of **core workflows** (not just people) > running with AI‑assist or AI‑first, plus provenance/governance > coverage.

1. **Seeding (2022--2024)** -- pilots & shadow use

- Copilots in coding/support/writing; workers experiment; cost/perf free‑fall begins. arXiv+2OUP Academic+2

- Adoption signal split: **high user‑level**, **low governed deployment**. Microsoft+1

2. **Early majority notice (2025--2026)** -- governance‑ready rollout

- Enterprises standardize on **function calling/structured output** patterns; provenance (C2PA) and **ISO‑42001** programs appear in audits. OpenAI+2spec.c2pa.org+2

- **EU AI Act** introduces **dated obligations**; regulated processes (hiring, credit, safety) land on controlled platforms first. Digital Strategy

3. **Acceleration (2027--2029)** -- integration beats point tools

- Agentic workflows stitched into ERP/HRIS/CRM; inter‑firm coordination (RFPs, POs, disputes) begins to resemble **AI‑age EDI**.

- Metrics move from "time saved" to **touchless rates**, **exception rates**, and **first‑pass yield**.

4. **Saturation (2030+)** -- AI‑assisted as the default

- Most white‑collar workflows have an AI stage by design; on‑device assistants are normal for field roles; provenance ubiquitous in external content.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Concrete indicators to watch (the new "barcodes, EDI, and R/3")

- **Governance coverage:** \# of firms certified/attested on **ISO‑42001**; internal adoption of **NIST AI RMF** controls. ISO+1

- **Provenance rate:** % of outward‑facing content with **C2PA credentials** (press, marketing, customer comms). spec.c2pa.org

- **Workflow penetration:** share of tickets/emails/cases resolved **AI‑first**; share of invoices/contracts processed **touchless**; copilot attach rates to licensed suites.

- **Cross‑firm volume:** ratio of **agent‑to‑system/API** transactions to human‑initiated ones (your EDI analogue).

- **Cost curve:** public **inference‑per‑token** or benchmark‑equivalent cost indices (AI Index‑style). Stanford HAI

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Investment & operating implications (under‑ and over‑owned themes)

- **Near‑term ROI buckets** (under a CFO's nose): developer productivity; support deflection/assistance; AP/AR and policy Q&A; marketing ops. These already have **measured** uplifts and clear denominators. arXiv+2OUP Academic+2

- **Standards as accelerants, not brakes.** The 1990s proved that **rules enable scale**; expect the same from **EU AI Act / ISO‑42001 / NIST RMF**. Firms that "productise governance" will move faster (the late‑majority moat). Digital Strategy+2ISO+2

- **Distribution & integration over raw modeling.** Just as **R/3** captured value by owning process integration, expect bundled suites and SIs to capture a large slice of returns in the middle innings; point solutions must earn a wedge via data advantage or workflow lock‑in. SAP+1

- **Watch the bottom‑up / top‑down gap.** High worker usage vs. low formal deployment is a recipe for "shadow AI" risks and stranded ROI. Closing the gap (identity, data, provenance) is a management competence, not a model benchmark. Microsoft+1

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Contrarian notes (with humility)

- **AI's first trillion of GDP won't look like "automation."** The early lift is **variance‑reduction** (novices catch up) rather than headcount cuts; BCG's RCT shows the **biggest gains** occur inside the AI frontier, not at the boundary where hype lives. Model that skill equalisation into wage bills before assuming net job losses. Harvard Business School

- **Barcodes beat charisma.** Provenance, IDs, and audit trails are boring---but they're your EAN/EDI moment for AI. Enterprises that invest here will get compounding returns when agents become multi‑system. spec.c2pa.org

- **The curve steepens as costs fall and rules harden.** The 280× cost drop + dated EU obligations is a combustible mix; the late majority moves when **both** CAPEX math and compliance checklists are favorable. Stanford HAI+1

*Wry coda:* Spreadsheets didn't "replace finance"; they made finance impossible to live without. Expect AI to do the same for process: fewer keystrokes, more thinking---and a lot more arguing about prompts than anyone budgeted for.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sources (selected, with short anchors)

- **Measured productivity effects:** Brynjolfsson--Li--Raymond (call centers, **\~15%**); GitHub Copilot RCT (**55.8% faster**); Noy--Zhang (writing). OUP Academic+2arXiv+2

- **Usage & adoption:** Microsoft Work Trend Index (**\~75%** of knowledge workers using AI); US Census BTOS (firm use to **produce** goods/services **\~3.8%**). Microsoft+1

- **Cost curve & macro adoption:** Stanford **AI Index 2025** (top takeaways; **\>280×** inference cost drop; rising enterprise use). Stanford HAI

- **Governance & standards:** **NIST AI RMF 1.0**; **ISO/IEC 42001 (2023)**; **EU AI Act** (entered into force **Aug 1, 2024**; key dates in **2025--27**). NIST Publications+2ISO+2

- **Historical rhymes:** VisiCalc/1‑2‑3; Ethernet/EDI; **SAP R/3 (1992)**; **barcodes (US 1974; UK 1979)**; **ADP (FY95)** operational scale. Annual Reports+5Wikipedia+5EDI Basics+5

------------------------------------------------------------------------

**Where to extend from here:** build a dashboard with the indicators above (governance coverage; provenance rate; AI‑first workflow share; inter‑firm agent/API traffic), plus a **two‑phase model** (installation→deployment) with EU/UK/US timelines layered in. That gives you a live S‑curve tied to dates, rules, and costs rather than vibes.

Ok, let's get a bit more high-level: I'm looking for a narrative sweep so you can be a bit more wordy. Also, please incorporate how Nicholas Negroponte's "Being Digital" identified the moves at that time and how they subsequently panned out.

**Summary (narrative sweep):**\ From mainframes to PCs to smartphones to cloud, each wave compressed cost, moved compute closer to the task, and rode a *standards* tailwind. Nicholas Negroponte's *Being Digital* gave the period a grammar---**bits vs atoms**, the **Negroponte Switch**, the **Daily Me**, and **agents**---and much of it played out on schedule. Read through that lens, AI adoption looks less like a single "Big Bang" than a familiar S‑curve: a spreadsheet‑like killer app (copilots), a standards/governance turn (the new EDI), integration into the suites we already live in, then edge ubiquity. The curve steepens when costs fall *and* rules harden. Digital Strategy+4Wikipedia+4Wikipedia+4

------------------------------------------------------------------------

The sweep, stitched to Being Digital

**1) Bits vs atoms → the center of gravity moves**\ Negroponte's core claim was simple and right: ship bits, not atoms---"A bit has no color, size, or weight, and it can travel at the speed of light." That mindset explained why the IBM PC became a finance tool (spreadsheets), why barcodes/EDI rewired supply chains, and why media unbundled into streams. Each time, value shifted from hardware to *arrangements*: protocols, formats, identity. AI rhymes with that: the "bit" isn't a file now but an *actionable prediction* glued to your systems through functions, APIs, and provenance. Stanford University+2Wikipedia+2

**2) The Negroponte Switch → where compute runs**\ Negroponte predicted that telephony would go **wireless** and TV would go **wired**---the famous Switch. Europe's GSM success shows how policy‑led standards can accelerate such flips, while cable/fiber plus IP video made television "wired." AI's echo: *training* centralizes in hyperscale clouds; *inference* increasingly drifts to the edge for latency, privacy, and cost---our proto‑Switch for AI workloads. Expect regulators (especially in Europe) to nudge more on‑device AI for sensitive data as ISO‑42001 and the EU AI Act bite. ISO+4Wikipedia+4EUR-Lex+4

**3) The Daily Me → personalization... and its side effects**\ Negroponte popularized the **Daily Me**---personalized news built at MIT as **Fishwrap**---a tidy abstraction of "narrowcasting." We got it, at planetary scale: algorithmic feeds, streaming menus, customized search. We also inherited the filter‑bubble critique Sunstein warned about---proof that prediction engines shape *exposure*, not just convenience. AI assistants now operationalize the Daily Me for *work*: drafting, summarizing, prioritizing---useful, but susceptible to tunnel vision unless we enforce diversity of sources and auditable provenance. Wikipedia+1

**4) "Agents" → from column to cubicle**\ Negroponte wrote in 1994 that *agents must learn and develop over time, like human friends and assistants*. That pitch is finally industrial: developer copilots speed tasks by **\~56%** in RCTs; call‑center assistants lift productivity **\~14--15%**, with the largest gains for novices---an "inverse skill bias." In short: agents don't just cut labor; they *compress variance*. That was not obvious in 1995; it is measurable now. OUP Academic+3WIRED+3arXiv+3

**5) "Things that Think" → the edge as habitat**\ The Media Lab's **Things That Think** and Negroponte's "wearables/softwear" columns anticipated ubiquitous devices and personal‑area networks. Smartphones, sensors, and wearables fulfilled the blueprint; AI now animates them. Expect the next leg of adoption when small models make *offline* agents useful without cloud round‑trips---the AI equivalent of barcode scanners becoming cheap enough to sit at every till. WIRED+2WIRED+2

------------------------------------------------------------------------

How the earlier waves teach us to read AI's S‑curve

**Seeding (late 1970s--early 1980s analogue) → 2022--2024**

- Then: VisiCalc/1‑2‑3 pulled PCs into finance; Ethernet made LANs normal.

- Now: copilots pull AI into coding, writing, and support; function‑calling/provenance standards make outputs "ledger‑ready." Evidence isn't vibes: **55.8% faster** coding in RCT; **\~15%** more tickets resolved per hour in live ops. NBER+4Wikipedia+4Wikipedia+4

**Inflection (mid‑1980s--early 1990s analogue) → 2025--2026**

- Then: EDI/GS1 + barcode turned stores and factories into databases; Europe set GSM, aligning policy and markets.

- Now: **ISO/IEC 42001** and the **EU AI Act** set governance/obligations with dated milestones (prohibitions from **Feb 2, 2025**; GPAI obligations **Aug 2, 2025**; broad applicability **Aug 2, 2026**). Rules aren't brake pedals; they're on‑ramps for the late majority. ISO+1

**Integration (early--mid 1990s analogue) → 2027--2029**

- Then: SAP R/3, PeopleSoft, Oracle stitched finance, HR, and materials; ADP industrialized payroll.

- Now: agentic steps will be *inside* M365, Workday, ServiceNow, SAP---identity, permissions, and data gravity live there. The KPI moves from "time saved" to *touchless rates* and *exception rates* across tickets, invoices, claims.

**Saturation (late 1990s analogue) → 2030+**

- Then: EDI dominated big‑firm trade value; Y2K finished the laggards.

- Now: provenance becomes default on external content; edge inference is assumed; "AI‑first" steps are baked into workflow templates. (And---as with FoxMeyer---some programs will overreach. New tech amplifies bad process.)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Where AI traction and savings show up first (and why Negroponte was right)

- **Text‑heavy, codified work.** Spreadsheets first conquered *finance math*. Today's first wins are *text math*: coding, support, drafting. They're measurable, frequent, and auditable---perfect for early S‑curve steepening. arXiv+1

- **Distribution beats novelty.** Just as Lotus 1‑2‑3 "sold" the PC, copilots are "selling" AI inside suites people already pay for. Expect the top‑line gains to accrue to vendors with distribution and identity, not the shiny point tools. Wikipedia

- **Standards are accelerants.** EDI/EDIFACT and GSM show Europe's edge in standardization. In AI, ISO‑42001 + EU AI Act will play the same role---aligning IT, audit, and legal so CFOs can fund at scale. Wikipedia+2ISO+2

- **Edge is the sleeper.** "Unwiring" telephony foretold smartphones; "rewiring" TV foretold streaming. In AI, *where* inference happens will be as decisive as *which* model you pick. The Switch was a policy/physics story; so is this. Wikipedia

------------------------------------------------------------------------

A few crisp receipts (short quotes & anchors)

- *Bits vs atoms:* "A bit has no color, size, or weight... \[and\] can travel at the speed of light." Stanford University

- *Agents:* "Agents must learn and develop over time, like human friends and assistants." WIRED

- *Daily Me:* Term and concept credited to Negroponte; MIT's **Fishwrap** prototyped it. Wikipedia

- *Copilot evidence:* "completed the task **55.8% faster**" (controlled trial). arXiv

- *Call‑center uplift:* AI raised issues resolved per hour by **\~15%** on average. OUP Academic

- *EU timing:* AI Act "entered into force on **1 August 2024**... **fully applicable** on **2 August 2026** (with staged earlier dates)." Digital Strategy

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Implications (investor/operator) with a wry twist

- **Model the *variance* story, not the headcount story.** Early ROI comes from novice uplift and error‑rate compression---like giving everyone the good analyst's spreadsheet model. That's a margin story before it's a job‑cuts story. OUP Academic

- **Bet on *boring* plumbing.** In the 1990s, EDI and barcodes made retailers operationally formidable. Today, provenance (C2PA), function‑calling patterns, and ISO‑aligned controls will be the compounding moats for AI at scale. (Snoozy? Yes. Profitable? Also yes.) WIRED

- **Expect a policy‑shaped S‑curve in Europe.** Europe's talent for standards (GSM, EDIFACT) is showing up again; adoption will feel slower in headline terms but faster once governance is in place---just like GSM's take‑off once the spec landed. EUR-Lex+1

- **Watch for the AI "Switch."** As on‑device models improve, expect a step‑change in field/service roles---latency, privacy, and cost will drag inference to the edge. The best enterprise bets will straddle cloud *and* device without religion. Wikipedia

*Humour, dry as a well‑kept ledger:* In 1995 we dreamed of "agents" bringing us coffee; we got assistants that file expenses and write emails. It's less cinematic, more cash‑flow positive---the sort of plot twist a CFO secretly loves.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sources (select, primary‑leaning)

- **Negroponte / *Being Digital***: bits vs atoms; Daily Me; Switch; agents; Media Lab programs. WIRED+4Stanford University+4Wikipedia+4

- **PC take‑off analogs:** VisiCalc (1979) and Lotus 1‑2‑3 (1983) as killer apps; Ethernet standardization (1983). Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2

- **Measured AI productivity lifts:** GitHub Copilot RCT; call‑center field deployment. arXiv+1

- **European standardization precedents & governance:** EDIFACT (1987 ISO 9735); EU AI Act timing; ISO/IEC 42001. Wikipedia+2Digital Strategy+2

------------------------------------------------------------------------

**Where to take this next:** build a *Negroponte‑style* dashboard for AI adoption: (1) **governance coverage** (ISO‑42001, EU Act phases), (2) **workflow penetration** (AI‑first tickets/invoices/contracts), (3) **provenance rate** on outbound content, (4) **edge share** of inference, and (5) **variance compression** (gap between novice and expert output). As with barcodes and EDI, the boring numbers tell the most interesting story.

Could you try to make this actionable: what companies, especially in small and mid cap areas most likely to see traction? What professions and demographic profiles will benefit most at first, which will be challenged? Give me your best map of the unfolding terrain for here to 2030.

**Summary (high-level, actionable):**\ Enterprise AI adoption through 2030 will rhyme with the "mainframe → desktop → smartphone → cloud" arc: early wins in a few measurable, workflow‑dense domains (coding, contact centers, finance back‑office, clinical documentation), followed by a platform shift that bakes AI into existing systems of record (search, security, identity, reporting). For small/mid‑caps, the best near‑term traction clusters around (1) contact‑center AI, (2) developer/ML tooling (vector databases, model management), (3) identity & provenance, (4) finance ops automation, and (5) AI‑enabled BPO. Regulation will shape the speed‑curve: the EU AI Act pulls forward demand for governance, provenance, and high‑risk use‑case controls from 2025--2027. arXiv+2NBER+2

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Where AI is already paying (and what that says about the S‑curve)

- **Contact centers (customer support).** A field deployment at a Fortune‑500 software firm found a **14% average productivity lift**, with **novices +34%**, and better customer sentiment---classic early‑majority signature where tacit knowledge can be "distilled" and shared by the model. arXiv

- **Software engineering.** A randomized trial with GitHub Copilot showed **55.8% faster task completion**---a clean, controlled measurement that explains why developer tools are sprinting ahead of other categories. arXiv+1

- **Clinical documentation.** Ambient scribe tools (Nuance DAX Copilot; Abridge; Augmedix) are scaling across Epic‑based health systems; Microsoft reports users save **\~5 minutes per encounter** with higher documentation quality and lower burnout. These are regulated, auditable workflows---good petri dishes for enterprise AI. PR Newswire+2Microsoft+2

- **Adoption reality check.** Surveys show **\~75% of knowledge workers** now use GenAI, but **firm‑level, production use** (U.S. Census BTOS) has been **single‑digit %**---the classic gap between experimentation and systematization. Expect the gap to close as governance and ROI measurement mature. lehd.ces.census.gov+3Microsoft+3assets-c4akfrf5b4d3f4b7.z01.azurefd.net+3

**Regulatory clock (EU, US) that shapes demand:**

- **EU AI Act**: entered into force **Aug 1, 2024**; bans apply **Feb 2, 2025**; **GPAI obligations Aug 2, 2025**; most rules fully applicable **Aug 2, 2026**. This creates a 2025--2027 spending window in provenance, risk management, model transparency, and high‑risk HR/credit tooling. NBER

- **ISO/IEC 42001** (AI management systems) + **NIST AI RMF** (and 2024 **GenAI Profile**) give large enterprises and the public sector a standardized buying checklist---tailwind for vendors that "speak compliance." MIT Economics+2NIST Publications+2

- **Content provenance (C2PA)** is moving from "nice to have" to default signals: **YouTube** will label "AI‑generated or altered" content; **Leica** and **Nikon** ship **C2PA‑enabled** cameras. Expect enterprise creative stacks to follow. Artificial Intelligence Act+1

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Small & mid‑cap opportunity set (US & Europe), 2025--2030

> *Heuristic:* back "workflow gravity" (frequent, measurable tasks) and > "compliance gravity" (auditable workflows). Below, I list **why now / > traction evidence / key risks** with primary‑source anchors.

1) Contact‑center AI (CCaaS/CX) --- early mainstream ROI

- **Five9 (FIVN)** --- agent assist, summarization, "Genius AI," deep ServiceNow/knowledge integrations; regular feature cadence. *Why now:* measurable handle‑time and CSAT deltas. *Risk:* hyperscaler bundling & price compression. Five9+2Forbes+2

- **NICE (NICE)** --- **Enlighten** AI bookings up sharply; "contextual memory" and domain‑trained CX models. *Why now:* integrated CXone base; strong attach opportunity. *Risk:* large‑cap competition. CX Today+1

- **LivePerson (LPSN)** --- pivoting to GenAI capabilities; new ROI features for agent experience and measurement. *Why now:* turnaround optionality; brand logos; measurable cost‑takeout. *Risk:* execution. PR Newswire+1\ **Why this bucket first:** matches the call‑center RCT evidence and fits operational KPIs CFOs already track. arXiv

2) Developer & ML/SW supply‑chain tooling --- the "picks & shovels"

- **Elastic (ESTC)** --- vector search + RAG ecosystem; preferred vector DB on Red Hat OpenShift AI; messaging as the "Search AI Company." *Why now:* most enterprises need retrieval before agents. *Risk:* open‑source competition, hyperscaler substitutes. Q4 Capital+2Elastic Investor Relations+2

- **Couchbase (BASE)** --- vector search across **cloud, server, and mobile/edge** (Couchbase Lite 3.2). *Why now:* unique "cloud‑to‑edge" RAG positioning for offline/latency‑sensitive apps. *Risk:* developer mindshare vs. Mongo/Elastic/SQLite+extensions. Couchbase Investors+1

- **JFrog (FROG)** --- positioning Artifactory as a **model registry** and supply‑chain for AI artifacts; NVIDIA NIM integrations. *Why now:* model/package governance is becoming table‑stakes. *Risk:* incumbents (Databricks/AWS) encroach. JFrog Investor Relations+1

- **GitLab (GTLB)** *(upper mid)* --- "Duo" AI features, with ROI dashboards; moving toward proactive AI agents in SDLC. *Risk:* Microsoft's GitHub gravity. about.gitlab.com+1

3) Identity, document verification & provenance --- regulation‑pull markets

- **Mitek (MITK)** --- ID doc verification + deepfake/synthetic detection added to stack; broad FI penetration. *Why now:* KYC/AML + fraud spikes tied to AI. *Risk:* management turnover; competition from platform IDPs. SEC+2miteksystems.com+2

- **GB Group (GBG.L)** --- UK identity & fraud; deepfakes/synthetic ID countermeasures in customer onboarding. *Why now:* EU/UK compliance and cross‑border onboarding demand. *Risk:* macro/IT budget cyclicality. GBG+1

- **Clear Secure (YOU)** --- expanding from airports into enterprise **CLEAR Verify** (KYC/age/employee onboarding). *Why now:* reusable identity model; partnerships. *Risk:* consumer sentiment/regulatory shifts. Clear Secure, Inc.+1

- **Provenance rails:** watch **C2PA** adoption in camera chains (Leica, Nikon) and platforms (YouTube "AI‑altered" labels) as telltales for enterprise content workflows. Artificial Intelligence Act+1

4) Finance Ops & Reporting (AP/AR/Close/GRC) --- CFO‑friendly automation

- **AvidXchange (AVDX)** --- AP workflow at SMB/mid‑market; **AI Approval Agent**; scale metrics supportive. *Why now:* straight‑through processing gains with clear audit trails. *Risk:* price competition vs. ERP suites. AvidXchange+1

- **BILL Holdings (BILL)** --- large SMB network; automation across AP/AR/spend; healthy platform KPIs. *Why now:* quickest path to cash/working‑capital ROI for SMB finance. *Risk:* SMB churn sensitivity. Q4 Holdings

- **BlackLine (BL)** --- AI in intercompany & close orchestration; steady enterprise install base. *Why now:* audit and compliance tailwinds; easy to prove ROI. *Risk:* suite encroachment. investors.blackline.com+1

- **Workiva (WK)** --- SEC/ESG/IA reporting with **GenAI** features and controls; first to include the **new Global Internal Audit Standards**. *Why now:* mandates meet automation. *Risk:* reporting cycles are lumpy. newsroom.workiva.com+1

5) AI‑enabled BPO & CX‑outsourcing --- margin expansion via GenAI

- **EXL Service (EXLS)** --- repositioning to "data & AI"; \>50% revenue in data/AI; cost actions to refocus talent mix. *Why now:* embeds AI into annuity processes. *Risk:* contract repricing; delivery geopolitics. GlobeNewswire+1

- **Concentrix (CNXC)** --- large CX footprint; explicit GenAI solutioning; improving FCF. *Why now:* vendor‑led AI standardization for Fortune‑500 CX. *Risk:* client insourcing. Concentrix Corporation+1

- **TaskUs (TASK)** / **TELUS International (TIXT)** --- AI services volatility normalizing; rebrands and platform refocus. *Risk:* program churn; pricing pressure. The Motley Fool+1

- **WNS (WNS)** --- expanding GenAI capabilities across vertical domains. *Risk:* growth cadence. Investing.com

6) Edge & on‑device AI --- smaller bets with asymmetric upside

- **Ambarella (AMBA)** --- CVflow 3.0 SoCs now run **vision‑language/reasoning models** at the edge. *Why now:* privacy, latency, and cost push inference to endpoints. *Risk:* automotive cycles; ASP pressure. investor.ambarella.com

- **CEVA (CEVA)** --- licensable **edge‑AI DSP/NPU IP**; levered to many OEMs. *Risk:* royalty timing. Ceva IP+1

- **Couchbase (BASE)** (again) --- **vector search on mobile/edge**---unique public pure‑play. Couchbase

> *Notes:* I've kept each name tied to a concrete, testable > wedge---features shipping, documented customer adoption, or explicit > investor disclosures---rather than "AI‑adjacent" buzz.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Professions & demographics: who benefits early, who's challenged?

- **Big uplift for novices and the "long tail."** Across multiple experiments (contact centers; BCG consultants), AI **compresses the productivity distribution**---novices benefit most, experts less so or not at all on some tasks. Expect early wage/bonus effects in junior customer support, sales ops, recruiting coordination, and entry‑level analysis/writing roles. arXiv+2Harvard Business School+2

- **Coding, IT, security analysts**: rapid gains where tasks are well‑specified, testable, and instrumented (Copilot; Security Copilot RCTs). Senior engineers shift toward architecture, code review, and orchestration skills. arXiv+1

- **Clinicians** (especially high‑documentation specialties): ambient scribe tools reduce admin load---time savings accrue first to overburdened ambulatory care settings. Microsoft

- **Administrative/clerical roles**---**most exposed** in advanced economies; women are **disproportionately represented** in these roles per ILO and IMF analyses. Upskilling pathways (prompting, QA, exception handling) will determine outcomes. IMF eLibrary+2International Labour Organization+2

- **Language effects.** Evidence is accumulating that **non‑native English** users may see above‑average gains on writing/communications tasks---an equalizer in global teams. SSRN

------------------------------------------------------------------------

A forward map to 2030 (with investment tells)

**2025--2026: "Systematize & govern."**

- Most enterprises move from BYOAI to governed platforms (NIST **GenAI Profile** checklists; ISO/IEC 42001), putting spend into **retrieval/search**, **identity**, **auditability**, and **contact‑center AI**. EU AI Act **GPAI obligations (Aug 2025)** and broader **full applicability (Aug 2026)** force enterprise‑grade controls. **Tells:** rising attach of vector DBs; RAG reference architectures in vendor decks; surge in content‑credential labels. NIST Publications+1

**2027--2028: "From copilots to workflows."**

- Agentic patterns with **guardrails & provenance** become default, stitched into ERP/CRM/ITSM (fewer standalone bots, more "AI inside"). Winners: tooling that shortens time‑to‑value (Elastic, Couchbase, JFrog), and CX stacks (Five9/NICE). **Tells:** vendor case studies listing double‑digit KPI improvements with statistically confident baselines; model‑agnostic orchestration.

**2029--2030: "Edge normalization."**

- Privacy/latency cost curves push more inference to devices and branch locations (Ambarella/CEVA; Couchbase Mobile vector search). **Tells:** RFPs require hybrid (cloud + edge) inference and offline RAG; camera and IIoT vendors promote **C2PA** and on‑device authenticity checks by default. investor.ambarella.com+2Couchbase+2

------------------------------------------------------------------------

How to underwrite the S‑curve (operator's lens you can test in channel checks)

1. **Unit economics \> demos.** Prioritize names with **measurable, recurring‑workflow ROI** (minutes saved/agent; % straight‑through invoices; tickets/hour; error‑rate, retention). The call‑center RCT and Copilot RCT give you benchmarks to sanity‑check claims. arXiv+1

2. **Retrieval \> reasoning (for now).** Most enterprise wins rely on **high‑quality retrieval** and **governed data**; vector DB adoption and log‑level observability are leading indicators. Elastic/Couchbase releases and Red Hat partnership are signals. Q4 Capital+1

3. **Compliance gravity.** Align picks with mandates: EU AI Act timelines, NIST/ISO alignment, C2PA. This favors identity (MITK, GBG, YOU), reporting/GRC (WK, BL), and content authenticity. NBER+2NIST Publications+2

4. **Platform gravity.** Expect consolidation: AI features collapse into existing suites (Microsoft, Salesforce, ServiceNow). Prefer small/mids with **distribution moats** (installed bases, partnerships) over single‑feature point apps.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Risks & contrarian notes (to keep us honest)

- **Commoditization squeeze.** Foundation‑model costs fall; hyperscalers bundle. Small/mids must win on **data adjacency, workflow depth, or compliance**---or risk being features, not companies.

- **Hype vs. hard savings.** U.S. Census BTOS still shows low firm‑level production use; watch for shelfware. Favor vendors that publish real KPI deltas, not "assistant" vanity metrics. Census.gov

- **Regulatory friction.** HR screening/recruiting AI is **high‑risk** under the EU AI Act---slower monetization path for HR tech relative to finance ops or CX. NBER

- **Creative/content markets bifurcate.** As **YouTube/C2PA** labels spread, demand may shift to "authenticated media" workflows---good for provenance rails, challenging for generic content tools. Artificial Intelligence Act

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quick reference: suggested watchlist by theme (SMID caps emphasized)

Developer/ML supply **ESTC, BASE, FROG, Retrieval/RAG & model‑ops are prerequisites for value. Q4 Capital+2Couchbase chain GTLB** Investors+2

Identity & **MITK, GBG.L, YOU** Fraud & KYC spikes; provenance mandates rising. miteksystems.com+1 provenance

Finance ops & **AVDX, BILL, BL, Audit‑friendly automation with clean ROI. reporting WK** AvidXchange+1

AI‑enabled BPO/CX **EXLS, CNXC, TASK, Embed AI into annuity workflows → margin leverage. TIXT, WNS** GlobeNewswire+1

Edge/on‑device AI **AMBA, CEVA** Latency/privacy economics push inference to edge. investor.ambarella.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

![](images/media/rId43.svg){width="0.20833333333333334in" height="0.20833333333333334in"}

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Close (implications & a small dose of wry realism)

If the late‑1970s--1990s taught us anything, it's that **the spreadsheet didn't win because it was smart; it won because it was everywhere**. AI's "everywhere" is retrieval + governance + boring but vital workflows. That's why the near‑term alpha is less in flashy "AI apps" and more in **picks‑and‑shovels that reduce time‑to‑value** (search/RAG, identity, provenance, finance ops) and in **domains with scoreboard metrics** (contact centers, coding, revenue ops, documentation‑heavy care). The rest---agents, autonomy, ubiquitous edge---likely arrives on schedule once the plumbing is in.

If you'd like, I can turn this into a one‑pager heat‑map with **signals to track** (attach rates, vector‑search usage, provenance labels, EU AI Act readiness disclosures) and a screen for SMID caps that report **statistically supported KPI deltas** in filings or case studies.

Please select the top 8 companies from your list with the highest revenue growth rates and go through their earnings call transcripts to find actual evidence of adoption and increasing contract backlogs.

Below is a tight, evidence‑based sweep of the eight fastest‑growing names from the earlier shortlist, ordered by most recent YoY revenue growth, with direct transcript/IR proof of adoption and backlog (RPO/bookings) momentum. Treat "backlog" as the company's own disclosed equivalent: RPO/CRPO (remaining performance obligations) or bookings. Where a business is usage/volume‑driven (e.g., payments), I note the closest operational proxy.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

TL;DR (one‑liner)

The growth leaders (GitLab, JFrog, Workiva, Elastic, CLEAR, Five9, Couchbase, BILL) are showing the classic early S‑curve tell: revenue up double digits **and** future revenue committed (RPO/bookings) growing at similar or faster clips---especially where AI or cloud shifts are the catalyst.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leaderboard snapshot

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Company Latest rev. growth (YoY) Backlog signal (YoY) What's doing the pulling? --------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **GitLab **+29%** (Q2 FY26) GitLab Investor Relations **Total RPO +32%** (to \~\$988m); cRPO +31% GitLab Investor Ultimate/Dedicated tiers, AI (Duo), platform consolidation (security + DevOps) [Q4 Capital (GTLB)** Relations](https://ir.gitlab.com/news/news-details/2025/GitLab-Reports-Second-Quarter-Fiscal-Year-2026-Financial-Results/default.aspx?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

**JFrog **+23%** (Q2'25) JFrog Investor Relations **RPO +75%** (to \~\$477m) Yahoo Finance Cloud +45% YoY; platform (Enterprise+) mix rising; security attach JFrog Investor Relations (FROG)**

**Workiva **+21%** (Q2'25) Workiva Newsroom **RPO ≈ \$1.2bn; \$668.3m \<12m, +23%** SEC+1 Larger‑deal mix (\>\$500k ACV +35% YoY); multi‑solution adoption Workiva Newsroom (WK)**

**Elastic **+20%** (Q1 FY26) Elastic Investor Relations **CRPO +18%** (to \~\$956m) Elastic Investor Gen‑AI search & security workloads; \>2,200 cloud customers on GenAI [Yahoo Finance (ESTC)** Relations](https://ir.elastic.co/news/news-details/2025/Elastic-Reports-First-Quarter-Fiscal-2026-Financial-Results/default.aspx?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

**Clear Secure **+17.5%** (Q2'25) Clear Secure, Inc. **Bookings +13.1%**; record CLEAR1 deal count/value Identity platform (CLEAR1) traction across workforce/healthcare; travel engine still strong (YOU)** Cloudfront Cloudfront

**Five9 **+12%** (Q2'25) SEC **Enterprise AI bookings \>3× YoY**; AI rev +42% YoY SEC AI agentic CX, consolidation from on‑prem CCaaS to Five9 SEC (FIVN)**

**Couchbase **+12%** (Q2 FY26) AOL **RPO +25%** (to \~\$271m) Capella (DBaaS) ARR growth; vector/AI search additions drive interest AOL (BASE)** investors.couchbase.com

**BILL (BILL)** **+12%** (Q4'25; core +15%) Usage‑led model (no RPO); automation penetration rising (fully automated bills **+80%**) YouTube AI agents auto‑classify/pay; TPV & transactions underpin growth investor.bill.com investor.bill.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

![](images/media/rId43.svg){width="0.20833333333333334in" height="0.20833333333333334in"}

> **Note on method:** I ranked by the latest reported YoY revenue print > from the companies we previously shortlisted, then checked their call > transcripts/IR for backlog proxies (RPO/CRPO/bookings) and concrete > adoption signals.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary‑source adoption & backlog receipts (quotes kept short)

1) GitLab (GTLB)

- **Adoption:** "**GitLab Ultimate now represents 53% of our total ARR**." Q4 Capital

- **Bookings pulse:** CFO: "**strongest month on bookings in the last two years**," with a front‑loaded quarter; SaaS/Dedicated growth "**92% year‑over‑year**." Q4 Capital

- **Backlog:** "**Total RPO grew 32% year‑over‑year to \$988.2 million**... cRPO +31%." GitLab Investor Relations\ **Read‑through:** Platform and AI features (Duo) are monetizing at the top tier; backlog outpacing revenue points to durable multi‑year commitments.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

2) JFrog (FROG)

- **Backlog:** "**RPO totaled \$476.7 million, a 75% increase year‑over‑year**." Yahoo Finance

- **Adoption/mix:** "**Enterprise+ subscription represented 55% of total revenue**." Cloud revenue +45% YoY. JFrog Investor Relations\ **Read‑through:** Multi‑year platform standardization (DevSecOps + artifact mgmt) is showing up directly in RPO; security and cloud are pulling the train.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

3) Workiva (WK)

- **Adoption/scale:** "**Customers with annual contract value over \$500,000 grew 35% year‑over‑year**." Workiva Newsroom

- **Backlog runway:** "**We expect revenue of approximately \$1.2 billion to be recognized from remaining performance obligations**... **\$668.3 million over the next twelve months**." SEC

- **Near‑term growth in backlog burn:** management noted the next‑12‑month piece is **+23% YoY**. Investing.com\ **Read‑through:** Larger, multi‑solution deals (ESG, Internal Controls, GRC) are pushing committed revenue higher and nearer‑dated---good cash conversion optics.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

4) Elastic (ESTC)

- **Backlog:** "**Current remaining performance obligations were \$956 million, an increase of 18% year‑over‑year**." Elastic Investor Relations

- **Adoption:** CEO: "**2,200 customers in Elastic Cloud \[using us\] for Gen AI use cases**." Yahoo Finance\ **Read‑through:** Consumption‑friendly GenAI search and security workloads are translating into CRPO growth and broadening cloud adoption.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

5) Clear Secure (YOU)

- **Backlog:** CFO: "**\$222.9 million of Total Bookings representing 13.1% growth**." Cloudfront

- **Adoption:** "**We signed over 25 CLEAR1 deals... a record quarter for CLEAR1**." Cloudfront\ **Read‑through:** Enterprise identity demand (workforce/healthcare/doc‑signing) is stacking future revenue while travel keeps the flywheel spinning.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

6) Five9 (FIVN)

- **Backlog proxy (bookings):** "**Enterprise AI bookings more than tripled year‑over‑year**." SEC

- **Adoption:** "**Enterprise AI revenue \[was\] accelerating to 42%**," now \~10% of enterprise subscription revenue. SEC\ **Read‑through:** AI agentic add‑ons are shifting mix and pulling through core CCaaS seats---classic "new engine on the old train" dynamic.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

7) Couchbase (BASE)

- **Backlog:** "**RPO... \$270.7 million, an increase of 25% year‑over‑year**." investors.couchbase.com

- **Adoption:** "**Revenue... up 12% year over year**" with ARR +22%---Capella (DBaaS) doing the heavy lifting. AOL\ **Read‑through:** As DBaaS penetration rises, multi‑year cloud commitments are accruing faster than recognized revenue---healthy early S‑curve shape.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

8) BILL (BILL)

- **Growth:** "**Total revenue was \$383.3 million, an increase of 12% year‑over‑year**... **Core revenue... increased 15%**." investor.bill.com

- **Adoption:** Management: AI "**has increased the number of fully automated bills by 80%**." YouTube\ **Read‑through:** Usage‑driven/TPV models don't publish RPO, but the automation penetration stat is a strong leading indicator for retention and monetization.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

So what?

- **Backlog \> revenue** is what you want to see in early diffusion. JFrog (+75% RPO), GitLab (+32% RPO), Elastic (+18% CRPO), Couchbase (+25% RPO) and Workiva (N12M RPO +23%) all fit the mold. That gap is your S‑curve "loading bar." Investing.com+4Yahoo Finance+4GitLab Investor Relations+4

- **AI‑native pull‑through** is real where the **platform** is the unit of value (DevSecOps, search, identity, CCaaS). Attach rates (GitLab Ultimate, JFrog Enterprise+, Five9 AI, Elastic Cloud) and larger deal cohorts (Workiva \>\$500k ACV) are the clearest tells. Workiva Newsroom+4Q4 Capital+4JFrog Investor Relations+4

- **Heterogeneity matters.** CLEAR and BILL don't do RPO like classic SaaS, but they're showing bookings/automation gains---credible proxies for forward revenue and margin leverage. Cloudfront+2investor.bill.com+2

Risks & contrarian notes (because cycles bite)

- **Front‑loaded quarters** can flatter momentum (GitLab flagged a heavy Month‑1 bookings skew). Watch conversion of bookings into billings/cash, not just ARR headlines. Q4 Capital

- **AI mix** can raise compute COGS before pricing catches up (Elastic/Five9). Margin trajectories need to confirm the topline story. Elastic Investor Relations+1

- **Macro/SMB exposure** (BILL, GitLab SMB) leaves growth sensitive to rate‑linked demand and churn; the best hedge is rising large‑deal mix and longer contracts. GitLab Investor Relations+1

------------------------------------------------------------------------

How to trade the terrain (pragmatic take)

1. **Prioritize "backlog outrunning revenue."** JFrog, GitLab, Workiva, Elastic are prime---multi‑year, multi‑module contracts plus AI‑driven mix shifts.

2. **Validate with deal‑size mix and attach rates.** Workiva's \>\$500k cohort (+35% YoY) or GitLab Ultimate share (53% of ARR) confirm pricing power and platform stickiness. Workiva Newsroom+1

3. **Hunt for AI‑specific bookings disclosures.** Five9's "\>3×" Enterprise AI bookings is as explicit as it gets---expect revenue follow‑through with a lag. SEC

4. **Give usage businesses a different yardstick.** For BILL, watch automation penetration and TPV per customer, not RPO. The 80% lift in fully automated bills is the forward KPI. YouTube

*Humour, lightly salted:* Backlog isn't cash, but it is the corporate equivalent of a love letter---promises to pay and stay. The trick is making sure it matures from poetry to invoices.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sources (primary where possible)

- **GitLab Q2 FY26** press release & transcript: revenue +29%; RPO +32%; bookings & mix commentary. Q4 Capital+3GitLab Investor Relations+3GitLab Investor Relations+3

- **JFrog Q2'25** IR & transcript highlights: revenue +23%; RPO +75%; cloud +45%; Enterprise+ 55% of revenue. JFrog Investor Relations+1

- **Workiva Q2'25** press release, 10‑Q & call notes: revenue +21%; RPO \~\$1.2bn (\$668.3m \<12m, +23% YoY); \>\$500k ACV +35%. Workiva Newsroom+2SEC+2

- **Elastic Q1 FY26** IR & call: revenue +20%; CRPO +18%; \>2,200 cloud customers using GenAI. Elastic Investor Relations+1

- **Clear Secure Q2'25** press & transcript: revenue +17.5%; bookings +13.1%; record CLEAR1 deals. Clear Secure, Inc.+1

- **Five9 Q2'25** SEC exhibit & IR: revenue +12%; Enterprise AI bookings \>3× YoY; AI revenue +42% YoY. SEC+1

- **Couchbase Q2 FY26** press: revenue +12%; RPO +25% YoY. AOL+1

- **BILL Q4'25** IR & call remarks: total revenue +12% (core +15%); AI automation +80% fully automated bills. investor.bill.com+1

------------------------------------------------------------------------

**Where to dig next:** Track next‑12‑month RPO (or bookings) vs. recognized revenue for conversion efficiency; watch attach‑rate disclosures (Ultimate/Enterprise+/AI modules); and follow any shift in payment terms/contract durations---those are the small hinges that swing big S‑curves.

Source: the-adoption-cycle-of-tech-as-told-by-history.md

# The Adoption Cycle of Tech as Told by History

What actually changed (and why it changed)

Adoption evidence (US & Europe)

Stylised timeline: the S‑curve (US & Europe), with function‑specific landmarks

Function‑by‑function impact

A data‑anchored S‑curve approximation (US & Europe)

Primary sources & granular notes (selected)

Takeaways (and a contrarian coda)

Where to dig next (if you want to go even deeper)

How the 1980s--90s playbook maps to AI (the rhymes)

Where productivity and cost‑savings show up first (evidence → intuition)

Why adoption is lumpy (and how to model it)

A stylised S‑curve for AI in US/Europe back‑ and front‑office (2024--2030+)

Concrete indicators to watch (the new "barcodes, EDI, and R/3")

Investment & operating implications (under‑ and over‑owned themes)

Contrarian notes (with humility)

Sources (selected, with short anchors)

The sweep, stitched to *Being Digital*

How the earlier waves teach us to read AI's S‑curve

Where AI traction and savings show up first (and why Negroponte was right)

A few crisp receipts (short quotes & anchors)

Implications (investor/operator) with a wry twist

Sources (select, primary‑leaning)

Where AI is already paying (and what that says about the S‑curve)

Small & mid‑cap opportunity set (US & Europe), 2025--2030

1) Contact‑center AI (CCaaS/CX) --- early mainstream ROI

2) Developer & ML/SW supply‑chain tooling --- the "picks & shovels"

3) Identity, document verification & provenance --- regulation‑pull markets

4) Finance Ops & Reporting (AP/AR/Close/GRC) --- CFO‑friendly automation

5) AI‑enabled BPO & CX‑outsourcing --- margin expansion via GenAI

6) Edge & on‑device AI --- smaller bets with asymmetric upside

Professions & demographics: who benefits early, who's challenged?

A forward map to 2030 (with investment tells)

How to underwrite the S‑curve (operator's lens you can test in channel checks)

Risks & contrarian notes (to keep us honest)

Quick reference: suggested watchlist by theme (SMID caps emphasized)

Close (implications & a small dose of wry realism)

TL;DR (one‑liner)

Leaderboard snapshot

Primary‑source adoption & backlog receipts (quotes kept short)

1) GitLab (GTLB)

2) JFrog (FROG)

3) Workiva (WK)

4) Elastic (ESTC)

5) Clear Secure (YOU)

6) Five9 (FIVN)

7) Couchbase (BASE)

8) BILL (BILL)

So what?

Risks & contrarian notes (because cycles bite)

How to trade the terrain (pragmatic take)

Sources (primary where possible)

The sweep, stitched to Being Digital